Friday, April 11, 2008
Final thoughts
My favorite discovery was reading coworkers's blogs and learning a bit more about them. It helped to know that some folks were confused or uncertain about the by some of the same things I was, or liked some of the same stuff. My favorite 2.0 things were
Flickr--will use this for both work and personal stuff.
Blogging--probably won't do a good job of keeping it up. I still struggle with wondering what I could possibly have to say that would be interesting to anybody else
Using bloglines for feeds. I now have waaaay too many feeds and will probably not read them all regularly, but it is great to be able to access them from anywhere.
Library Thing--may be a long time before I get all our stuff in. I have visions of someday having an Iphone or some such and accessing my catalog from a bookstore, to check for gaps in various fantasy or mystery series. And I still buy actual CDs--it would be great to have quick access to the list of what we have. And no, we don't have thousands like Michael!
Del.icio.us --still need to get my favorite bookmarks added since setting up the account.
IM --I'm using it at work and probably won't be doing much personal IM , especially since my techie son has gotten a "real" job and isn't at his home computer with his chat on all day. I'm sure he could do it from work but he probably doesn't want mom bothering him...
YouTube. it's just fun. I'll probably never post anything but should never say never I guess. I think this has a lot of potential for library programming.
Stuff I'm still not so sure about?
Twitter...struggling to find the gold nugget here.
Image Generators... looks like fun but probably won't use much
Rollyo ..didn't quite get the hang of it but can see the utility
Thanks very much to Shannon, Michael, Allana, Christa and Susan for all your help. This was fun and I'd definitely do it again.
Chatting
Podcasts thing 21
From NET I subscribed to All about Books. Using one of the search directories and the Environment category I found and subscribed to Living Planet, a podcast from the World Wildlife Federation. NPR is a veritable mother lode of cool stuff and I could have subsribed to many. I limited myself to the hourly news update and Fiona Ritchie's Thistlepod.
The Journal Star podcasts looked mildly interesting but not enough to subscribe.
now to find time to use them! The nice thing about Bloglines is that I will be able to access the non-work stuff from elsewhere.
Piggy Puppets on YouTube--thing 20
Tuesday, April 8, 2008
Orange Nanaimo Bars
The Orange Nanaimo Bar
Ingredients:
* 2 cups Graham wafer crumbs
* 1 cup Coconut, unsweetened, flaked
* 1/2 cup Pecans; toasted, chopped
* 2/3 cup Butter
* 1/3 cup Cocoa powder; unsweetened sifted
* 1/4 cup Sugar, granulated
* 1 Egg; beaten
***GRAND MARNIER LAYER***
* 2 cups Icing Sugar
* 1/4 cup Butter; softened
* 1/4 cup Grand Marnier;or orange liqueur
* 1 tablespoon Orange rind; coarsely grated
***CHOCOLATE TOPPING***
* 1 tablespoon Butter
* 4 ounces Semisweet chocolate; melted
Directions:
In bowl, stir together crumbs, coconut and pecans. In small saucepan, gently heat butter, cocoa and sugar until butter melts. Remove from heat; whisk in egg. Blend into crumb mixture. Press into greased 9 inch square cake pan. Bake in 350F oven for 10 minutes. Let cool on rack.
Grand Marnier Layer: In bowl, place half of icing sugar with butter, mix in half of the icing sugar with butter; mix in Grand Marnier, remaining icing sugar and orange rind. Spread over base.
Chocolate Topping: Stir butter into chocolate until melted; spread evenly over Grand Marnier layer. Let cool for 20 minutes in refrigerator; cut into bars. (Bars can be covered, refrigerated up to 2 weeks, or frozen up to 2 months. Let soften slightly before serving.
This recipe for Orange Nanaimo Bars serves/makes 24.
Monday, April 7, 2008
Thing 16 Wikis
Joe Janes made a good point in his PLA poscast when he said we need to get over being squeamish about using the Wikipedia. If you don't agree with an entry fix it! That's overly optimistic for me, but I agree that we shouldn't reject something out of hand because the content isn't completely controlled. Wikipedia seems to be fairly good at regulating itself.
The wiki examples were really interesting. The St. Joseph County Public Library pathfinders were only editable by library staff--sort of a wiki version of our Best of the Web? http://www.libraryforlife.org/subjectguides/index.php/Main_Page
I see a lot of value in using wikis to track projects that several people work on--so editing would probably be limited to people working on the project. For one open to more people the conference example was good--still limited to registrants to cut down on spam.
Friday, April 4, 2008
Library 2.0
The three Icebers to steer away from in Away From Icebergs seem like a no brainer http://www.oclc.org/nextspace/002/2.htm We shouldn't be building "just in case" collections (unless we have a mandate to do it, such as our state documents collection). If our way of doing things is so difficult that we have to train our users, we aren't going to have many users. And avoiding the "come to us" is obvious.
This was reinforced for me watching Joe Jane's presentation at PLA today (thanks Lisa for bringing that up for us!). He also talks about needing to take our services to where people are--chatting, emailing, talking in person or on the phone (we even thought about wandering around in Second Life asking people if they needed answers). It was reassuring to hear him say it's OK to do it badly at first--you will get better!